Archive for Internet Governance

ICANNers Call for Transparency in Selection Process of Next CEO

The current CEO of ICANN made the announcement on 16 August 2011 his intention to leave the corporation in July 2012, at the end of his current contract. This was quickly followed by an official announcement on the ICANN website. Some concern was expressed about the way the search for a CEO had been conducted in 2009, a process which many consider had not been transparent, nor a model of good governance within the ICANN Board itself.

In this context of fairly wide concern for the future of ICANN, a group of ICANNers, (in alphabetic order)

AIZU Izumi, from Japan; 

Manal ISMAIL, from Egypt; 

Yrjö LÄNSIPURO, from Finland; 

Evan LEIBOVITCH, from Canada;

Alejandro PISANTY, from Mexico;

Nii QUAYNOR, from Ghana; 

Njeri RIONGE, from Kenya; 

Carlton SAMUELS, from Jamaica and US;

Jean-Jacques SUBRENAT, from France; and,

XUE Hong, from China,

reflected on the situation, and on 17 September 2011, sent the following letter to Dr. Stephen D. Crocker, Chair of the Board of Directors of ICANN.

The letter was widely circulated in the community and more people are showing their support. For example, two persons from North America have asked to add them as co-signatories.

The content of the Open Letter is below. The Chinese version is attached as well.

“As a group of friends of ICANN from various parts of the world, we would be grateful if you would share this letter with your fellow Directors.

The President & CEO of ICANN has announced that he will be leaving this corporation in July 2012, when his current contract expires. At a time when ICANN has to deal with other important challenges, its Board of Directors will have the additional task of selecting his successor.

In any corporation, selecting a CEO is one of the most crucial responsibilities incumbent upon the Board. In ICANN, with its distinctive multi-stakeholder structure and volunteer Board, the importance of such a choice cannot be overstated, especially at this stage in the development of the Internet and of ICANN itself. The progress made by ICANN so far must be further consolidated. At the same time, upholding the value of the multi-stakeholder model, which some are actively seeking to jeopardize, requires continuity of purpose as well as renewed imagination. Under the guidance and oversight of the Board, the next CEO will have the duty not only of leading, but also of strengthening ICANN.

The selection of a new CEO, shortly after the completion of the first Accountability and Transparency Review, provides the Board with an excellent opportunity to demonstrate that it is now fully equipped and prepared to implement all the ATRT recommendations, perhaps even to go beyond that. In the spirit of these recommendations, the Board of ICANN should adopt a more transparent and accountable method for the selection and appointment of the next CEO.

Candidates should be sought through a transparent process (appropriate advertising in global and regional media; call for tenders in order to choose an external consultant, if one is needed). The Board should remain on top of the process, so that all its members are fully informed by the time a decision is called for. Failing to abide by these basic rules of good governance would expose Board members to the risk of eschewing one of their chief responsibilities toward the ICANN community, which is the duty of care. While the confidentiality of some Board deliberations sets understandable constraints, it is possible and desirable, within those bounds, to carry out the selection process in an open and transparent manner, so as to make it irrefutable. It is also important that the next CEO be chosen before the end of the predecessor’s current term, and be ready to begin without delay.

These improvements would be in line with ICANN’s committments. They would also send a strong signal of confidence and clarity to ICANN’s worldwide community, while at the same time consolidating the foundation upon which it aspires to build further global partnerships for the Internet and its users.

With best wishes to you and the Board of Directors, we remain

Yours sincerely”

致互联网名称与数字地址分配机构(ICANN)理事会的公开信

 尊敬的理事会主席库克先生:

吾辈ICANN之友谨此致信于阁下并理事会其他人士。

ICANN现总裁暨首席执行官任期将届满,将于2012年7月卸任。籍此ICANN关键之际,理事会必于万机之中,着眼于选任继任者之重任。

任一机构之中,选任首席执行官均为理事会之第一要务。于ICANN,独特之多方利益相关者之结构及其志愿者理事会,此选择之重大,莫可过之,更遑论互联网与ICANN正值发展之机。已获之进展葺需巩固。持多方利益相关者模式之价值,不致其危,需目的之坚持、想象之充盈。理事会之指导与监督下,下一任首席执行官之职责何止领导,更在加强。

新首席执行官选择正值首次问责和透明度审查完成之后不久,理事会可以此证明践行所有之问责及透明度之建议,甚或可过之。此等建议精神之下,理事会甚应于新任首席执行官之选任中愈加透明与负责。

候选人应藉透明之程找寻(经全球和地区媒体之适当宣传;如有必需,或可以招标之法选择一外部顾问)。理事会应全程领导,决定之时,全体成员均须充分知悉。置妥善治理基本规则于不顾,将致理事会成员不履行于互联网社区之主要职责(即注意义务)之境地。虽理事会某些商议之秘密性需予合理保护,然于此界限之内,将选举过程公开、透明展开、不授人以柄,实为可行与理想之举。下一任首席执行官之选择须在本届任期结束之前进行,不可迟延,极其重要。

上述之改进符合ICANN所承担之义务。籍此ICANN向全世界社区传递信任与透明之明确信号,同时巩固其基础,并进一步奠定与互联网及其用户之全球合作。

致敬于您及理事会成员全体!

商祺

IZU Izumi 自日本; Manal ISMAIL 自埃及; Yrjö LÄNSIPURO 自芬兰Evan Leibovitch 自加拿大;Alejandro PISANTY 自墨西哥;Nii QUAYNOR 自加纳; Njeri RIONGE 自肯尼亚Carlton Samuels自牙买加和美国; Jean-Jacques SUBRENAT 自法国薛虹自中国

二零一一年九月十七日

Comments off

Prof. Xue Appointed to ICANN ccNSO Council

On 5 August 2011, the Nominating Committee announced its selections for eight leadership positions within ICANN.Prof. Hong Xue is the only appointed Council Member of ccNSO. The Appointees will take up their positions after the end of ICANN’s Annual General Meeting in Dakar, Senegal, on 28 October 2011.

The NomCom’s Chair, Adam Peake, said “We are very pleased to have been able to select such high quality people to join ICANN. They are a great group, bringing skills and experience that will serve the community well. It’s been a tough job, the NomCom had to choose from a very strong applicant pool, with many highly qualified candidates for every position, including a record number of female applicants. After many hours of teleconferences and meetings, and then almost two and half days of discussion locked away in a room in Singapore, we reached unanimous agreement on all the selected nominees and the overall slate that includes individuals from China, Germany, Jamaica, Malaysia, Nigeria, Philippines and United States. Thanks to my committee for their hard work, and on behalf of all the NomCom a very sincere Thank You to all 88 candidates who gave their time and effort in volunteering to help ICANN”.

The NomCom evaluated over eighty-eight candidates, many of whom with exceptional qualifications in relation to the key criteria as set out in the ICANN Bylaws. With such a rich pool of candidates and very few seats to fill, the NomCom found itself unable to appoint all the applicants the Committee members would have desired to see on the Board and on the other bodies.

This year’s Nominating Committee received 88 Statements of Interest from candidates all over the world (23 female and 65 male), during its open nomination period from 17 December 2010 to 4 April 2011. The regional breakdown of this year’s candidates is:

  • 19 from Africa,
  • 24 from Asia/Australia/Pacific
  • 14 from Europe
  • 15 from Latin America/Caribbean
  • 16 from North America

 

Comments off

Founding Event of Asia Pacific Internet Leadership Program Succeeded in Beijing

The founding APILP organized by the Institute for Internet Policy & Law of Beijing Normal University was held in Beijing on July 6-8, 2011. Program Director and Chair of Faculty Board is Dr. Prof. Hong Xue, Director of Institute for Internet Policy & Law, Beijing Normal University.

Asia Pacific Internet Leadership Program (APILP) is the very first multi-disciplinary and multi-stakeholder capacity building project on Internet Governance in Asia Pacific. The Founding Event was successfully held in Beijing. A group of distinguished experts from academia, governance organizations, technical community and judiciary in Asia Pacific constituted the faculty board. 20 fellows  from a variety of stakeholder groups joined the event. As the Faculty Chair, Prof. Xue, stated at the Opening Ceremony, APILP features 3 keywords as Internet, Governance and Asia Pacific and is becoming a research/learning center on Internet governance issues for this Region. The core members of the Faculty Board and the leading scholars from Australia, China, India, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland, Taiwan Economy unanimously agree to continue the project. Next year the event will be hosted by India NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad.

Academic Faculty Board for founding APILP

Dr. Prof. Hong Xue, APILP Faculty Chair, Director of Institute for Internet Policy & Law, Beijing Normal University, China

Prof. Ang Peng Hwa, Director, Singapore Internet Research Centre; Acting Head, Division of Journalism and Publishing, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore

Ms. Bonnie Chun, HKIRC, Hong Kong SAR China

Mr. Champika Wijayatunga, Training Manager, APNIC

Ms. Christine Runnegar, ISOC, Switzerland

Prof. Izumi Aizu, Senior Research Fellow & Professor at Institute for InfoSocinomics, Tama University , Japan

Mr. Kuo-wei Wu, Director of Board, ICANN, USA

Prof. Vivekanandan, Ministry of HRD IP Chair Professor, NALSAR University of Law, India

 

Scientific program :

Day 1: Wednesday July 6, 2011

8:30-9:30 Registration

9:30-12:30 Opening and Orientation

Introduction to Internet governance—An Asia-Pacific Prospective

Lectures and discussions will focus on general issues and principles of Internet governance and current policy and legal framework. Historical review and stocktaking will analyze and assess the principles of openness, access, diversity and security. Lecturers and discussions will specifically address the concerns and priorities of Asia-Pacific Region.

9:30-10:30 Welcoming Addresses (Video 1)

Faculty Chair: Prof. Hong Xue, Director of IIIPL, Beijing Normal University

Speakers:

Prof. Bingzhi Zhao, Dean of Law School, Beijing Normal University

Pof. Qiheng Hu, President of Internet Society of China

Prof. Xiangyang Huang, General Director of CNNIC

Prof. Xianqiang Tang, Deputy General Director of CONAC

10:30-10:40 Break

10:40-11:10 Participants’ Networking

11:10-12:30 Keynote Speeches (Video 2)

Prof. Peng Hwa Ang, Director of Singapore Internet Research Center, Nanyang Technology University

Prof. Izumi Aizu, Japan Tama University, Co-Coordinator of Internet Governance Caucus

12:30-14:30 Lunch Break

14:30-17:30 Internet Technology and Infrastructure: Training by APNIC (Video 3)

This session will elaborate on how Internet works, what are the organizations that coordinate its addressing system, how these organizations relate to each other in an ecosystem and how decisions are being made by the Internet community.

Chair: Mr. Champika Wijayatunga, Training Manager, APNIC

Speakers:

Dr. Shuo Shen, Deputy Director of Development and Research Center, CNNIC

Mr. Champika Wijayatunga, Training Manager, APNIC

18:00 Social Dinner Sponsored by APNIC

Day 2: Thursday, July 7, 2011

9:00-12:00 Managing Critical Internet Resources

Lectures and forum discussion will examine the current regime of management of critical Internet resources, particularly ICANN domain name policies that have significant impact on diversity, access and security.

9:00-10:00 Issues in New gTLDs (Video 4)

Chair: Prof. Kuowei Wu, Member of ICANN Board of Directors

Showcase of ICANN Video on New gTLD Program

Discussants:

HKIRC, CNNIC, CONAC, .Asia, .Telnet, JPNIC, Zodiacs

10:00-10:15 Coffee Break

10:15-12:00 Comparative study of registration management (Video 5)

Issues: IDNs, vertical Integration, trademark measures, supporting developing countries, whois accuracy, illegal contents

Chair: Mr. Edmon Chung, CEO of DotAsia and Member of ALAC

Speakers:

Ms. Bonnie Chun, HKIRC

Dr. Shuo Shen, Deputy Director of Development and Research Center, CNNIC

Mr. Yang Yu, Director of Legal and International Affairs, CONAC

Mr. Edmon Chung, CEO of DotAsia and Member of ALAC

Ms. Lucy Wang, General Manager, .Telnet

Mr. James Seng, CEO of Zodiac and Member of ALAC

12:00-14:00 Lunch Break

14:00-17:00 Critical Legal Issues in Internet Governance

Lecturers will address a variety of legal issues, such as alternative dispute resolution to domain name disputes and intermediary liability of Internet service providers.

14:00-14:45 ADR and Data Protection (Video 6)

Chair: Ms. Christine Runnegar, Senior Manager of Public Policy, ISOC

Speakers:

Ms. Christine Runnegar, Senior Manager of Public Policy, ISOC

Dr. Hu Li, Deputy Secretary General, CIETAC

Mr. Fanwu Wang, Chief Judge of Civil Tribunal, Beijing 2nd Intermediate People’s Court

14:45-15:00 Coffee Break

15:00-17:00 Copyright on the Internet (Video 7)

Chair: Prof. Hong Xue, Director of IIIPL, Beijing Normal University

Speakers:

Dr. Dongchuan Luo, Director of Research Division, Supreme People’s Court

Ms. Hong Ge, Judge of Intellectual Property Tribunal, Beijing 2nd Intermediate People’s Court

Ms. Xiurong Ma, Judge of Intellectual Property Tribunal, Supreme People’s Court

Prof.V.C. Vivekanandan Director of Global Internet Governance & Advocacy, Ministry of HRD IP Chair Professor, India NALSAR University of Law

17:00 Conclusion (certificate issuance)

18:00 Social Dinner Sponsored by DotAsia

Day 3: Friday July 8, 2011

9:00-12:00 Faculty Board Meeting (for speakers only)

12:00-13:00 Lunch

13:00-18:00 Tour to Great Wall (for speakers only)

 

Background

“Internet governance is the development and application by governments, the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programs that shape the evolution and use of the Internet.” -Paragraph 34, WSIS Tunis Agenda

Asia Pacific has more than a half of world population. The Internet penetration in the Regional is growing rapidly. By the end of 2010, almost a half of world Internet users will be in Asia Pacific. Governance issues, such as Critical Internet Resources, Security and Stability, privacy, e-commerce, cyber-crime, network neutrality, dispute resolution, Internet of things, etc., are critically defining the development of this region. However, Asia-Pacific’s multi-stakeholder participation in the global Internet governance is considerably underdeveloped. Technical community and civil society in Asia-Pacific Region is particularly underrepresented and inarticulate in most global arenas on Internet governance. ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNET LEADERSHIP PROJECT (APILP) wishes to enhance regional capacity on policy-making and process-building for global governance of the Internet.

Given the tremendous diversity in languages, cultures, eco-social status in this Region, a systematic, informative and insightful training program will meet the pressing need of the Regional. Asia-Pacific Internet Leadership Program (APILP) will provide a unique opportunity for the Asia-Pacific participants from various stakeholder groups who have actively involved in Internet governance activities. We invite technical and management community (such ccTLD managers, gTLD registries, registrars), governmental officials, civil society leaders and Internet entrepreneurs to become the fellows. APILP  will provides Internet policy training or brainstorming for current or future leaders of Asia-Pacific Region.

 

Sponsors for Beijing Event

CNNIC

CONAC

APNIC

DotAsia

Singapore Internet Research Centre

 

 

Comments (650)

首届亚太互联网治理国际研讨会成功在京举行

 2011年7月6-7日,由北京师范大学互联网政策与法律研究中心主办、中国互联网信息中心(CNNIC)、政务和公益机构域名注册管理中心(CONAC)、亚太互联网信息中心(APNIC)、新加坡互联网研究中心、.Asia以及.Telnic 等多家单位协办的亚太互联网治理国际研讨会APILP在法学院18层学术报告厅隆重举行。北京师范大学法学两院院长赵秉志、互联网政策与法律研究中心主任薛虹教授、中国互联网协会理事长胡启恒女士、中国互联网信息中心(CNNIC)主任黄向阳教授、政务和公益机构域名注册管理中心(CONAC)副主任唐贤强先生、最高人民法院研究中心主任罗东川法官、北京第二中级人民法院民庭庭长王范武先生、最高人民法院知识产权法庭马秀荣法官、CNNIC的发展研究中心副主任沈烁博士、CIETAC副秘书长李虎博士、新加坡互联网研究中心主任Peng Hwa Ang教授、日本互联网治理核心小组的联合协调员Izumi Aizu教授、ICANN理事吴国维教授、互联网协会公共政策高级官员Christine Runnegar女士、印度NALSAR大学法学院V.C. Vivekanandan教授、APNIC培训官员Champika Wijayatunga先生等出席了此次会议并发言。

在本次研讨会中,诸多青年学子们也积极参与其中,纷纷提问和发言,和与会专家探讨了许多有关互联网综合治理的问题。与会人员畅所欲言、气氛活跃而融洽,既为国内外互联网领域的专家们提供了深入探讨互联网治理方面的机会,也加大了我院在互联网领域的学术影响力,更为亚太互联网治理起到了积极的推动作用。

首届亚太互联网治理国际研讨会议程

2011767日 中国北京北京师范大学新主楼18层法学院会议室

主办方:北京师范大学互联网政策与法律研究中心

赞助方:CNNIC, CONAC, APNIC, .Asia, Singapore Internet Research Center, .Tel.

201176日,星期三(第一天)

8:309:30 注册

9:3012:30 开幕式和情况介绍

互联网治理的介绍——亚太的未来发展

演讲和讨论将着眼于互联网治理和当前政策与法律框架内的一般问题和原则规定。通过历史性回顾和盘点,分析并评价开放性、可访问性、多样性和安全性的原则。演讲和讨论将专门针对亚太地区关注的问题和重点展开。

9:3010:30 欢迎仪式

主持人:薛虹教授 北京师范大学互联网政策与法律研究中心主任

演讲者:

赵秉志教授 北京师范大学法学院、刑事法律科学研究院院长

胡启恒女士 中国互联网协会理事长

黄向阳教授 中国互联网信息中心(CNNIC)主任

唐贤强先生  政务和公益机构域名注册管理中心(CONAC)副主任

10:40-11:10 与会者自我介绍

11:10-12:30 主题演讲

Peng Hwa Ang教授 新加坡互联网研究中心主任,南洋理工大学

Izumi Aizu教授 日本多摩大学,互联网治理核心小组的联合协调员

12:30-14:30 午餐

14:3017:30 互联网技术和结构:由亚太互联网信息中心(APNIC)进行培训

此部分将详细说明互联网如何工作,协调处理系统的组织有哪些,在该系统中这些组织之间的相互关系和互联网社会的决定是如何做出的。

主持人:Champika Wijayatunga先生APNIC培训经理

演讲者:

沈烁博士CNNIC的发展研究中心副主任

Champika Wijayatunga先生APNIC培训经理

17:30 APNIC欢迎晚宴

201177日,星期四(第二天)

9:0012:00 关键互联网资源的管理

讲座和论坛讨论将对当前的关键互联网资源管理制度,特别是对多样性、可访问性和安全性有重要影响的ICANN域名政策进行考察。

9:0010:00 新通用顶级域的问题

主持人:吳國維教授 ICANN理事

播放ICANN关于新增通用顶级域名的国际推广活动的短片

讨论者:HKIRC, CNNIC, CONAC, .Asia, .Telnet, JPNIC, Zodiacs

10:1512:00 注册管理的比较研究(国际化域名、纵向整合、商标措施、支持发展中国家,whois的准确性,非法内容)

主持人:Edmon Chung先生DotAsia首席执行官&ALAC成员

演讲者:Bonnie Chun女士HKIRC官员

沈烁博士 CNNIC的发展研究中心副主任

俞阳先生 CONAC国际、法律部主任

Edmon Chung先生DotAsia首席执行官

Lucy Wang女士 .Telnet总经理

James Seng先生 Zodiac首席执行官

12:00-14:00 午餐

14:0017:00 互联网址里的关键法律问题

讲座涉及一系列法律问题,例如域名纠纷的替代争议解决和互联网服务提供者的中介责任。

14:0014:45 替代争议解决(ADR)和信息保护

主持人:Christine Runnegar女士,公共政策高级经理,ISOC

演讲者:Christine Runnegar女士,公共政策高级经理,ISOC

李虎博士 CIETAC副秘书长

王范武先生 北京第二中级人民法院民庭庭长

15:0017:00 互联网版权

主持人:薛虹教授 北京师范大学互联网政策与法律研究中心主任

演讲者:

罗东川法官 最高人民法院应用法律研究所所长

葛红法官 北京第二中级人民法院知识产权庭

马秀荣法官 最高人民法院知识产权审判庭

V.C. Vivekanandan教授 印度NALSAR大学法学院

17:00 闭幕式

17:30 DotAsia欢送晚宴

 

Comments off

AP Regional IGF and ICANN in Singapore

Mid-June was a busy time. 2 Internet events was held in Singapore consecutively. The 2nd Asia Pacific Regional IGF was on June 15-16, 2011 in Singapore Suntec Center and ICANN meeting was on June 19-24, 2011 in Raffles Place.

Regional IGF was a policy discussion form involving a couple of stakeholder groups. Although few local participants joined the event, the Regional IGF attracted many overseas visitors. Prof. Xue chaired the plenary session “Anti-Counterfeit and Other Controversies” and managed to organize interesting presentations and discussions.

Introduction

The Anti-Counterfeit Trade Agreement would be a treaty to put in place new and higher international standards on intellectual property enforcement. Apart from its obvious TRIPS-Plus nature and forceful use of ISPs as private police, ACTA reveals a couple of critically important aspects that deserve careful scrutiny from the perspective of Internet Governance. ACTA’s plurilateral and closed negotiation process directly goes against the multi-stakeholder and open and transparent participation principles developed for Internet Governance. ACTA’s narrow focus on intellectual property rights ignores human rights concerns, especially free speech and access to the Internet, that are essential in the information society. ACTA demonstrate the temptation to shift from the existing multilateral WIPO-WTO regime to a more restricted and opaque system to enforce the private exclusive rights on the global information network. In addition, other domestic (such as US Bill “Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA)”) or private (such as ICANN’s trademark measures in new gTLD process) enforcement measures for intellectual property will exert significant global impact. The session intends to have a vivid discussion on all these interesting issues in the most populous and economic-booming region of the world.

Chair: Hong Xue (Beijing Normal University)

Speakers included academics, businesses and technical community from US, Switzerland, Hong Kong SAR, New Zealand and Malaysia.

Summary

This session talked about the following issues:

a)      Specific legal initiative, such as US new legislative initiative, especially protecting IP to use domain name system to enforce intellectual property rights. Intermediary liability has always been a big issue for the development of internet, cloud computing and its impact on intellectual property.

b)      Obviously, our focus of discussion has been on anti-counterfeit trade agreement. The forum shifting from multilateral to plurlateral, and the local response to this ACTA negotiation process.

A couple of lessons learned from the discussions.

Lesson 1 is that most people agree on the process for making IP law or policy should be opened and transparent. The secrecy of ACTA negotiation is really the wrong way to presume the IP interest and will not balance the whole system.

Lesson 2 is that internet property should be updated and refreshed. Internet property was created after industrial revolution and international IP regime has been going on for more than 100 years. However, we are now facing the new business model, new media environment and especially the new way of life. In order to make intellectual property effective, internet, in our new social media environment, to make it relevant to our real life, and need to be remixed, and recreated. Intellectual property is supposed to protect creation and stimulate originality. It should be able to be creative by itself. It should not be stifled and refused to respond to new business and media environment.

Lesson 3 is that we believe intellectual property is only a link of the whole social life, so it should be accessed in a wider context and take into account the impact on consumer protection, on business competition and especially on human right protection, including but not limited to privacy and free speech.

Prof. Xue was also panelists of the other two parallel sessions, i.e. ICANN and New gTLD and International Law Enforcement. The conference materials are on the website.

ICANN meeting in Singapore immediately followed the regional IGF. After more than 10 years’ debates and 6 years’ policy making and despite pressure from GAC and USG, ICANN Board finally approved the new gTLD program around 12:00pm on June 20, 2011.  Few people applauded at the decision but many others were too tired and fed up by the long process to be excited.

Prof. Xue raised a visionary question at the Public Forum but was interrupted by the stepping down Chair of Board who seemed wanting to spend most of the time ceremonially, well for his friend. The question is about the implementation of the so-called trademark clearing house. Not only non-Latin trademarks could be excluded as “device marks” by a database operators who know nothing about the trademark scripts, but the trademark service providers without knowledge of Chinese language would deem the domain names in simplified characters not visually similar to the trademark in traditional characters, vice verse. It seems the very technical variants table would have to be referred by both the database operator and verification center to prevent “variant-squatting” in new gTLD process. Unfortunately ICANN Board did not have the chance to listen to such important view.

Comments off

« Previous Page« Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries »Next Page »