Archive for Internet Governance

BNU IIPL成为中国网络空间安全协会理事单位

2016年3月25日,中国网络空间安全协会成立大会在北京远望楼宾馆成功举行。BNU作为发起单位与其他150多家会员单位参与了大会。

大会共分为三个部分,第一部分,中国网络空间安全协会第一届会员代表大会。大会通过了协会章程(草案)、选举办法(草案)、会费缴纳管理办法(草案)等重要文件,并选举产生协会第一届理事会,BNU被选举为理事会成员,IIPL薛虹教授为单位代表;第二部分,中国网络空间安全协会第一届理事会第一次会议。会议选举产生了协会常务理事、副理事长以及理事长。根据理事长提名选举产生了协会秘书长。中国工程院院士、北京邮电大学教授方滨兴当选第一届理事长。随后方滨兴教授发表讲话,表示协会将致力于打造“三个一流”的协会,共建能够推进社会、经济、学术等共同发展的网络平台,协助政府管理,维护公共网络安全。

第三部分,中国网络空间安全协会成立大会。中国网信办副主任王秀军讲话,肯定了过去两年中各有关部门为筹备中国网络空间安全协会的成立所做的贡献,指导了协会未来的发展方向。随后,王秀军部长与民政部民间组织管理局巡视员李波共同为协会揭牌。

Comments off

新治理智库联盟预备会议

互联网治理风起云涌,经济发展亮点不断,学术研究不应落后。2016年伊始,又有新的研究形式出现。2月23日,新治理智库联盟预备会议在北京理工大学国际大厦举行,国家行政学院、北大、北师大、北理工等众多学人,阿里巴巴、京东、百度、腾讯等互联网企业,济济一堂,共商新治理议题。薛虹教授在发言中指出,利益有关各方共同参与的新治理模式比较适应互联网的生态系统,可以在实践中探索发展,例如考虑国家互联网治理论坛(National IGF)等形式。薛虹教授还谈到,法律体系与法律研究需要正视互联网的现实,具有挑战传统理论,颠覆传统观念的勇气与决心。互联网上的版权制度就是处于被颠覆的状况,学界却没有足够的想象力,寻找全新的解决方案。薛教授还提到,互联网上平台服务的治理权力,必须在法律层面得到反映,所谓“平等主体的民事关系”不是束缚头脑的借口,即便在传统的民事法律关系中也存在监护等非平等的关系,平台与其用户之间的不平等性真实存在于相生相克的互联网生态系统中。

与会各位均有兴趣继续研究与合作。现在各个大洲都已经有了关于互联网治理的培训课程及相关机制,例如在欧洲有历经十年的SSIG,拉丁美洲有South School of Internet Governance,非洲与北美也有类似的能力建设项目。薛虹教授曾经在亚洲举办过两届Asia Pacific Internet Leadership Project (APILP),并在共同发起Asia Pacific School of Internet Governance (APSIG),主要课程内容包括互联网治理的发展历史、互联网的技术构架、互联网治理的利益有关各方、主要的政策与法律问题,等。在我国与亚太地区发展互联网治理能力建设项目的前景广阔。

Comments off

Professor Xue Gave the Keynote Speech at 2015 Global Congress on IP & the Public Interest

The Fourth Global Congress on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest took place on December 15-17, 2015 at National Law University, Delhi, India.

The Global Congress was co-hosted by The Centre for Internet& Society, National Law University Delhi, Open African Innovation Research, CREATe, The American Assembly, Columbia University and American University. And it was co-sponsored by OSF, IDRC, Fang.com and Centre for WTO Studies.

The theme for the 2015 Congress is “Three Decades of Openness; Two Decades of TRIPS”, which juxtaposed the beginnings of an aspect of a culture of Openness with that of the establishment of minimum standards of intellectual property protection and the carving of limitations and exceptions within these standards.

The2015 Congress opened with Plenary Sessions featuring keynote addresses delivered by persons of eminence across disciplines, before having participants break out into theme-specific rooms for presentations, workshops and panel discussions. The keynote speakers were Professor Ranbir Singh, Vice Chancellor of the National Law University (NLU) in Delhi, where the conference was taking place. This was followed by Keynotes from eminent scholars, activists and negotiators – Mr. Sean Flynn (US), Prof. Michael Geist (Canada), Mr. Zakir Thomas (India), Prof. Hong Xue (China Beijing Normal University IIPL Director), Mr. G.R. Raghavender (India) and Prof. Nagla Rizk (Egypt), who all set the scene from the historic to the contemporary context.

Prof. Xue presented on “Rethinking Internet Intermediaries in the International eTrade”, in which she eloquently pointed out that the emerging pervasive cross-border e-commerce has brought up the salient challenges to the current international intellectual property regime, especially customs measures for intellectual property enforcement for international goods trade. The aggregation effect of the traditional de minimis in the international e-trade threatens the customs enforcement that is only suitable for large scale commercial consignments. The blurring line between B2B and B2C in the cross-border e-commerce calls for new information access, enforcement measures and assistance from the critical stakeholders, i.e. Internet Intermediaries or platform services. Prof. Xue emphasized that a 3rd dimension (on platform governance) be recognized and reviewed in the law to enable an updated, effective and balanced IP enforcement for the globalized eTrade. Prof. Xue’s presentation was warmly hailed as one of the most impressive and thoughtful researches unveiled at the 2015 Global Congress.

After the focused keynote speakers and plenary sessions, the 2015 Global Congress carried out discussions through 4 parallel “tracks”, in the fields of “Openness”, “Access to Medicines”, “User Rights”, and “IP & Development”.

 The Global Congress began in Washington DC in 2011, moved to Rio de Janeiro in 2012, and was held in Cape Town in 2013. This year’s Congress featured an additional “Room of Scholars”. “The Room of Scholars” had been conceptualized as that cross­cutting space, not restricted to a particular track but as running along side them. The “Room of Scholars” became an opportunity for the presentation of longer, more detailed academic research papers on the theme of the Congress.

The Global Congress on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest has become the most significant event on the calendar for scholars and policy advocates working on intellectual property from a public interest perspective. The Global Congress supports the formation of strong networks and the dissemination of research and strategies among academics and practitioners, with the aim of empowering them to respond to law reform and enforcement proposals that threaten access and innovation, and to put forward a positive agenda for policy reform.

Specifically, the 2015 Congress sought to produce three outcomes- first, the mobilization of existing scholarly research directly into the hands of civil society advocates, business leaders and policy makers, leading to evidence-based policies and practices; second, the collaborative identification of urgent, global and local research priorities and generation of a joint research/advocacy agenda; and third, the solidification of an inter-disciplinary, cross-sector and global networked community of experts and practitioners focused on public interest aspects of IP policy and practice. The event attended by over 400 scholars, advocates, policy-makers and practitioners, was the biggest global gathering of public interest folk specialized in intellectual property issues in 2015. The 2015 Congress is expected to achieve all three goals it set for itself.

Comments off

APrIGF 2015 & Exchange Program with Macao Law School

6th APrIGF was successfully held on July 1-3, 2015 in Macao. Asia Pacific Regional Internet Governance Forum (APrIGF) is one of the key regional initiatives on Internet governance which provides an open platform for multi-stakeholders to discuss and identify issues and priorities, and ultimately advances the development of Internet governance in the Asia Pacific region as well as bring forward and contribute to the wider global Internet community. APrIGF 2015 was hosted by Macau University of Science & Technology, Macao, HNET.Asia – the registry for the “.mo” ccTLD of Macau – and by the Macau High Technology Industry Chamber. It was in conjunction with an annual local telecommunications event, CommunicMacau Expo, from 3 to 5 July 2015. More than 300 participants from more than 20 Asia Pacific countries and economies joined the event. An IIPL’s fellow was selected to join the Youth IGF concurrent with the main session.

Prof. Xue gave a keynote speech on the plenary “Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability” on July 3 and analyzed the new Chinese legal initiatives (such as Draft Cyber Security Law, revised Criminal Law and Consumer Protection Law) in the lens of the Principles. The speech was warmly welcomed by the audience at APrIGF.

During the event, the delegate of Beijing Normal University Law School, led by the Dean Prof. Zhao Bingzhi, paid the official visit to the Law School of Macau University and discussed with MU Law Dean Prof. Mo Shijian and Associate Dean Prof. Augusto Teixeira GARCIA regarding the collaboration of two schools, particularly enabling BNU students in Hande School Portuguese Program to access the exchange and even Master degree opportunity in Macau. The Dean of BNU Law School, Prof. Zhao, also discussed with Macau Prosecution Officials regarding BNU students’ possible internship in Macau judiciary.

Comments off

IIPL继续助力我国电子商务立法工作

薛虹教授担任起草小组组长的《网络零售第三方平台交易规则制定程序规定(试行)》于2014年12月24日由商务部正式发布,将于2015年4月1日施行。该“规定”的起草工作于2011年6月开始,经3年的艰苦工作,终于完成了草案,征求了有关部委、企业及社会各界的意见,多次修改,多伦论证。该“规定”实现了多方面的的制度创新,并对于多部其他部门的有关规章产生了实质性的影响。“规定”首次明确了交易规则(本规定所称交易规则,是指网络零售第三方平台经营者制定、修改、实施的适用于使用平台服务的不特定主体、涉及社会公共利益的公开规则)、第三方平台经营者(本规定所称网络零售第三方平台经营者,是指为其他经营者进行网络零售提供虚拟经营场所及相关服务,且在中华人民共和国境内经营的法人及其他组织)的定义,对于主要的交易规则进行了分类,并对于第三方平台经营者制定、修订交易规则的程序加以规范。在尊重市场逻辑的前提下,从程序正义与社会监督的角度强化第三方平台的问责制度,是制度性创新的重要表现。

IIPL继续支持我国的电子商务立法工作。2015年1月9日下午电子商务立法起草工作小组会议在北师大举行。各方专家就立法的框架、主要问题、篇章结构进行了深入的讨论,并形成了“立法大纲的讨论稿”,将在1月20-22日的立法调研会议上向有关领导汇报。

详见相关的媒体报道:

《法制日报》2014年6月10日专题报道《电子商务立法应吸收国际立法最新成果-访北京师范大学互联网政策与法律研究中心主任薛虹》。

《法制日报》2015年1月1日专题报道 《海淘成跨境电子商务新增长点专家建议:加入国际贸易法律框架争取话语权》。

 

 

Comments off

« Previous Page« Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries »Next Page »