ICANN Review on Fast Track IDN ccTLDs

ICANN’s year-end annual meeting is happening at Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, December 5-10. This is one of 3 ICANN global meetings held yearly. Cartagena must be a nice city. I can see the Walled Old Town with Towers, Churches and cannons on the Wall, which is opposite to the Convention Center. But apart from enjoying the sunshine of Caribbean Sea at the breaks, I have been at the conferences or en route to the conference.

IDN fast track process review is one of the sessions. ICANN staff chaired the session. Senior Director on IDNs presented on the following aspects of fast track process:

- Transparency
- Community Support
- Meaningfulness
- Determination of the IDN ccTLD manager
- IDN Tables
- Disputes
- Confusingly similar string
- Objection/re-evaluation rights

Although there were less than 30 participants in the plenary room, the session brought up interesting information. At the end of the presentation, there were questions raised on the Internet referred to .бг (applied Bulgaria IDN ccTLD string) case. The staff restated that they were not supposed to comment on any specific case.

I then asked a procedural question. Although the String evaluation done by DNS stability panel (according to their guidelines) is a technical decision, it is a decision made on behalf of ICANN and has (significant) policy implication. If such technical determination is not subject to reconsideration or independent review, wouldn’t it be an accountability issue, as highlighted by ICANN at the opening ceremony?

To my *rough* memory, both replied that fast track process should be sufficiently simply, without objection or re-evaluation. And, surprisingly both ICANN staff replied that anyone would be available to reconsideration or review. I assume I heard their reply clearly. The audio record at the link is broken unfortunately.

********************

Interestingly, ICANN staff made a statement on December 4, 2010 on Internet Governance list: “The Fast Track Process is a limited process set up for the initial implementations of IDN ccTLDs. It was a factor in the community development of the process that there should be no reconsideration process included specific to the Fast Track process because it was a limited approach to only those requests where no dispute, questions, or otherwise concerns existed.” “Now, the process is a year old, and hence we are conducting a review of how well it functions and if any changes should be made. There is a public forum online and also a session scheduled in Cartagena. We will discuss all aspects of the process there.”

ICANN Senior Director on IDNs later responded in following two bulletin points:

  • The fast track process was built limited in nature and for those applications where there is no concerns or no disputes of any kind. I also said I believe this is an appropriate approach for the initial IDN TLD delegations. It does however not mean that things should be more liberal in the future, but it is always easier to expand a program than to narrow it after the fact.
  • Anyone at ICANN who are unhappy about a decision and not able to solve this with staff, can always go to the Ombudsman or seek reconsideration through the process for such. For details about these general processes, which are non-dependant on the fast track process, but part of ICANNs Accountability and Review Processes, please see the link.

The case reveals the ICANN’s matrix of Ombudsman, reconsideration, independent review or other “accountability mechanisms” (if any). There are built-in appeal systems for a specific program and there are others generally applied.

21 Comments

  1. best protein shakes for women said,

    February 2, 2011 @ 3:55 am

    Good!!! Bookmarked this page that has this amazing content. Will come back to see if there are any updates. You, the author, are a master. Thanks

  2. Alfred Carnovale said,

    February 7, 2011 @ 1:54 am

    I’d be inclined to give the go-ahead with you here. Which is not something I usually do! I love reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to speak my mind!

  3. hearing loss in the elderly said,

    February 8, 2011 @ 4:44 pm

    Hello.This article was really fascinating, particularly since I was searching for thoughts on this topic last couple of days.

  4. occupational hearing loss said,

    February 8, 2011 @ 5:55 pm

    You made some nice points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found most guys will approve with your blog.

  5. hearing damage said,

    February 8, 2011 @ 9:47 pm

    Very good written post. It will be valuable to anybody who utilizes it, as well as myself. Keep up the good work – i will definitely read more posts.

  6. hearing loss age said,

    February 8, 2011 @ 10:29 pm

    You made a number of good points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found a good number of folks will go along with with your blog.

  7. deafness and hearing loss said,

    February 10, 2011 @ 5:57 am

    Very good written information. It will be supportive to anybody who usess it, as well as myself. Keep doing what you are doing – for sure i will check out more posts.

  8. nerve hearing loss said,

    February 10, 2011 @ 8:49 am

    Hello. fantastic job. I did not anticipate this. This is a great story. Thanks!

  9. hard of hearing said,

    February 10, 2011 @ 6:08 pm

    Well I truly enjoyed reading it. This tip offered by you is very useful for correct planning.

  10. occupational hearing loss said,

    February 10, 2011 @ 7:36 pm

    You made some nice points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found most persons will consent with your blog.

  11. Hearing Loss said,

    February 12, 2011 @ 5:49 am

    Definitely, what a great website and enlightening posts, I definitely will bookmark your site.Have an awsome day!

  12. Hearing Loss said,

    February 12, 2011 @ 6:38 am

    Hello.This article was extremely motivating, especially because I was searching for thoughts on this issue last Sunday.

  13. hearing problems said,

    February 12, 2011 @ 7:27 am

    You made some nice points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found most guys will approve with your site.

  14. hearing loss age said,

    February 12, 2011 @ 9:02 am

    You completed some fine points there. I did a search on the topic and found most folks will go along with with your blog.

  15. signs of hearing loss said,

    February 14, 2011 @ 12:30 am

    Hello. Great job. I did not expect this. This is a great story. Thanks!

  16. reverse hearing loss said,

    February 14, 2011 @ 12:39 am

    Hello.This article was extremely motivating, especially because I was searching for thoughts on this issue last Sunday.

  17. michigan bankruptcy attorney said,

    February 15, 2011 @ 4:53 am

    Many thanks for making the effort to discuss this, I feel strongly about this and enjoy learning a great deal more on this topic. If possible, as you gain knowledge, would you mind updating your website with a great deal more info? It’s extremely beneficial for me.

  18. asymmetrical hearing loss said,

    February 15, 2011 @ 10:22 am

    Hello.This article was extremely remarkable, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this topic last Friday.

  19. hearing treatment said,

    February 15, 2011 @ 4:33 pm

    I have been checking out a few of your posts and it’s pretty good stuff. I will surely bookmark your blog.

  20. Cine5 canli yayin said,

    February 17, 2011 @ 2:15 pm

    Please, are you able to PM me and tell me couple of far more acknowledges this, I am genuinely fan of one’s blog page…will get solved properly asap.

  21. Fox Tv canli yayin said,

    February 17, 2011 @ 2:15 pm

    High quality post dude. It’s good to study. thank you for spending time to write excellent things for us.

RSS feed for comments on this post